In 1981, President Ronald Reagan said that “Trees cause more pollution than automobiles do.” Not long afterward, I found a sign tied to an oak tree upon which a comedian had scribbled the words, Stop me before I kill again! I laughed out loud. Trees, after all, do not kill. Perhaps, however, I should not have laughed. The Leftist, working from his coloring book, Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, has engaged the machinery of banishment to exile to the wilderness Tea Partiers and all Conservatives. He has launched a campaign of vilification, defamation and inane falsehoods. The strategy is simple enough. If the Leftist succeeds in portraying Tea Partiers as dangerous psychotics, he will at once have destroyed conservative credibility and distracted a public he regards as naïve, malleable, credulous and not overly bright.
Just as President O’Bama, described Virginians as a dim lot, uncultured, and unread, who out of primeval resentments cling bitterly to their long guns so now will the Leftist banish to the wilderness men and women who think, question, and far worse cross examine fearlessly the radical leftist world view of the President and his Congress. The Democrats for the nonce are nibbling caviar and sipping wine. They have mounted to their face painfully wide and desperate smiles. They talk of aggression; they plan conquests; there is nothing they cannot do. And yet, they talk too quickly and loud. They are startled by loud noises. They seem to be waiting for a heavy shoe to drop; and so it will. For “There is something rotten in the State of Denmark.” Hamlet Act 1, scene 4, 87–91. There is something bubbling out of the hollow silence followed the President’s signing of the Health Care Bill.
It is the Tea Partiers create the Leftist’s anxiety. The Tea Partiers are too serious and intelligent. They will not cease from painful questions. They are a determined people. They know too well the cause of freedom breathed them into being. They are calm, well tempered and deliberate. They have challenged the stonewall raised to their question. They have shown contempt for Leftist mendacity, and outright perfidy. They do not hate, but they have this look and rational grace about them says, “Don’t Tread on Me!” It is this look hollows out the Leftist’s confidence, and paints a strained, porcelain smile upon his face.
Leftists, Democrats and Media, have launched a bruising attack upon conservatives. They claim that following the President’s signing of the Health Care Bill conservatives spat on Blacks, called Barney Frank a “fag.” and physically threatened other Democrats. Case closed therefore; we are like the Virginians: a clique of malcontents hold tightly to our guns; our knuckles drag upon the earth, we suck beer, beat our wives, watch too much TV, sing country music nasally and still believe Hank Williams never died. (Well this last, of course, is true; he never did).
There are two defenses must be made to Leftist treachery. The first defense is defiance. It is not enough to rise above, to become detached, to vote Republican. Instead gird your loins, and impeach with truth their libels published to the world. The second defense is to expose Leftist hypocrisy. Here is the truth. The Leftist when he engages the machinery of banishment will defame, libel, intimidate, will banish with sophistry if he can the truth of who and what we are. He will engage in hate speak because for him it is an article of faith that the public will believe anything so long as he shouts it loud and long enough. The press will ignore or approve hate speak directed at conservatives. It will ignore the rampant ugliness of the Leftist at his work.
Here is proof. Conservative journalist Noel Sheppard, in his post of Saturday March 27,2010, found too harsh Mike Malloy’s hopes for the future of several well known conservatives. “As the mainstream media hyperventilate over what is now regularly being referred to as rightwing hate speak, liberal talk radio host Mike Malloy Friday actually called for conservative talkers Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and Bill O'Reilly to commit suicide.” Here is the psychotic Leftist who would accuse Tea Partiers of psychotic hate.
"You rat bastards are going to cause another Murrah federal building explosion," said Malloy. "[M]aybe at that point Beck will do the honorable thing and blow his brains out."… Maybe at that point, Limbaugh will do the honorable thing and just gobble up enough - enough Viagra that he becomes absolutely rigid and keels over dead. And… "Maybe then O'Reilly will just drink a vat of that poison he spews out on America every night and choke to death"
And here is Washington Post, Leftist Courtland Malloy. While we are relieved that he does not demand our suicide, still somewhere in the tortuous labyrinth of his mind is a malignant, festering hate.
I know how the "tea party" people feel, the anger, venom and bile that many of them showed during the recent House vote on health-care reform. I know because I want to spit on them, take one of their "Obama Plan White Slavery" signs and knock every racist and homophobic tooth out of their Cro-Magnon heads…I am sick of these people -- and those who make excuses for them and their victim-whiner mentality.
Leftists like the Malloys, if left unrestrained or denied calming medication, would banish Tea Partiers to a fate more dreadful than the wilderness. But tell me Malloy how would we contain the Leftist’s wrath were a Tea Partier to suggest you quaff an overdose of cool aid—if you have not already done so?
Journalist John Hinderker reminded Leftists of the terrorist acts they committed at the 2008 Republican convention in St. Paul. Anti-Bush and anti-Republican protesters,
”…threw bricks through the windows of buses, sending elderly convention delegates to the hospital [and] dropped bags of sand off highway overpasses onto vehicles below… For some reason, political violence was not a concern less than two years ago. Yet today, we can hardly imagine what would happen if a group of tea partiers were to drop sandbags off a highway overpass, trying to kill motorists below. …To my knowledge, not a single Democratic politician condemned this anti-Republican violence or attempted in any way to distance the Democratic Party from it.
In a strategy calculated, brutal and un-American tea party men and women have been smeared by the machine of banishment: By the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, by Congressional Democrats and the President of the United States, Barrack O’Bama. They have called us “Astro turf, Liars, Terrorists, Racists, Nazis, Rednecks, Xenophobes, Ku Klux Klanners, and Homophobes.” We were naive. We discovered later the Left graced us with the nickname “Tea Bagger” words which describe a gross homosexual sex act.
In the Leftist’s engagement of the machinery of banishment, there is no moral or rational line he will not cross nor words, however rife with hate, he will not shout out loud and long. Harvey Wasserman and Bob Fitrakis justify their libel of former President George Bush by reliance on the hate speak of Senator Robert Byrd. First, however, they shower the former Ku Klux Clansman with fawning praise.
A conservative Democrat who has represented West Virginia in the Senate for decades, Byrd is one of America's leading Constitutional scholars. He is known as the master of Senate procedures. A passionate student of the English language, his epic orations for peace and the preservation of historic American freedoms are likely to grace school texts for decades to come.
Here the Leftist employs a tactic by which they quote each other’s trash as if it were Byronic prose.
"That the mainstream media has again found newsworthy the long-established connections between the Bush family and the Nazi Party is also instructive. . . . For sixty years it has been a matter of public record that Prescott Bush helped finance Hitler's rise to power and world war. . . . But right-wing Bush fanatics continue to deny those ties existed. . . .”
US Senator Robert Byrd, on the floor of Congress, on October 17, has explicitly compared the Bush media operation to that run by Herman Goering, mastermind of the Nazi putsch against the German people. Coming on the floor of the US Senate, Byrd's searing critique indicates that the equation of Team Bush with the Nazi elite has gained a certain mainstream credibility That the cautious, thoughtful Byrd has conjured explicit comparisons between the infamous mass murderer Hermann Goering and the administration of George W. Bush is a stunning commentary on how far to the right the Republicans have really gone. Goering was convicted of crimes against humanity at the Nuremberg Nazi war crimes tribunal after World War II. He killed himself just before he was to be executed.
Carl Rove didn’t escape the Nazi epithet. Here the authors giveth and taketh away. While on the one hand they publish Al Marten’s withdrawal of his accusation that Rove is a Nazi, they paste him with the epithet again because of a remark they claim Rove made at a base ball game.
Widespread allegations linking Karl Rove to family ties of explicit Nazi origin have been withdrawn by Al Marten, who originally publicized them through his web site. But Rove is quoted in Bob Woodward's best-selling BUSH AT WAR as comparing the reaction of a New York Yankee crowd to an appearance by Bush as being "like a Nazi rally."
Leftists have also labeled Rush Limbaugh a Nazi. What is their proof? The moronic notion that as Mr. Limbaugh takes medication for chronic back pain, just as did the late Hermann Goering, Rush Limbaugh must also be a Nazi. Vilification does not require a high I.Q.
Does Rush's apparent narcotic addiction resemble that of Hermann Goering? Is [Limbaugh] the Right's real minister of propaganda? Do his "dittoheads" resemble the unthinking brownshirts that terrorized millions?"
These are the same wing nuts who just recently attempted to characterize Sarah Palin as a Nordic Alaskan berserker simply because she used the term “Reload” to describe the gearing up of her campaign and the term “target states” to identify the state where she would speak. “On Thursday's American Morning, CNN's John Roberts [awash in crocodile tears] repeatedly decried the "troubling language" against pro-ObamaCare congressman which "violate any sense of common decency." Really? “But his own program over three years earlier helped promote a controversial 2006 movie, which forwarded an imaginary assassination attempt against then-President George W. Bush.”
Leftists believe that Carl Rove is no respecter of Constitutions. You may remember the nice lady, a member of the leftist Code Pink who drenched her hands in pig’s blood, entered the Senate chamber and attempted to assault Condoleezza Rice. Michelle Malken writes that Code Pink O’Bama supporter “…Jodie Evans pulled her old “citizens’ arrest” prank and stormed right up to Rove with handcuffs. She and other members tried to incite the crowd with shouts of “war criminal.” Carl Rove “was shouted down and forced to leave the stage.”
Another woman screamed at Rove, “The only comfort I take is that…you’re going to rot in hell.” Rove, [insensitive, boorish, and cruel, so say Leftists]… charged that the people shouting him down were an example of the “totalitarianism of the left…they don’t believe in dialog…they don’t believe in courtesy. They don’t believe in first Amendment rights for anyone but themselves.”
What might have been the Leftist’s response? “Is Mr. Rove without conscience or sense of courtesy? Must he answer legitimate debate with strident condemnation, particularly when debating a defenseless woman? How dare he accuse her of usurping the First Amendment merely because she wished to take comfort in expressing her belief that Mr. Rove a “war criminal” was going to rot in hell? We know most certainly that he will. Well then Mr. Rove have you no respect at all for the Constitution or common courtesy?”
Finally, the grand Buchanan, in his March 29, 2010, column The real anti-Americans summarizes the shameful history of the American Leftist. He reminds us of the violence raged in the cities and towns of America, in American Universities in the burning of ROTC buildings, in the vandalizing of professors' offices, and the taking over of Columbia University in 1968. He reminds us of the Leftist’s support of the Communist Viet Cong National Liberation Front, and his feverish hatred of the American soldier who—as the Leftist chanted poems in praise of Ho Chi Min— was fighting and dying by the hundreds in Viet Nam.
Where is the Leftist’s shame? Why will he not admit his guilt for the death of hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese who upon the surrender of Vietnam were reeducated, disappeared or the Boat People who were forced to brave a piratical sea. Why does he pretend innocence when he is guilty of a Cambodian holocaust that history justly has laid at his feet?
Well, we have listened to rank theories, and hypocrisy. And now the Leftist claims that, like a powder keg, we will ignite, explode, cry havoc, torch automobiles, heist 7/11s, and loot chitins and gravy, ammo and TVs from Walmart stores. Worse still they allege we male rogues will most likely satiate our wanton lust, in the riotous deflowering of innumerable Democrat maidens. The very thought is wearying.
What conclusions may be drawn from this Leftist strategy? That we don’t get it? That we are a bunch of ignorant white people, genetically shrived of compassion and of any sense of commitment to the less fortunate? That we are selfish and care nothing for our country and society? That we are deserving of banishment. For this alone, our banishment, the Leftist will try to push Tea Partiers beyond the pale, will whip them hard with ridicule, will corrupt their name, character and reputation, will prove them unworthy of belief, will try to convince the world that Tea Partiers are fanatic, false and ignorant, illegitimate and uninformed. They will attack and demean the character of the Tea Partier rather than engage him in debate—because for Leftist the debate is already lost—and all that now remains for him is libel.
What is to be done? Well, Tea Partiers have a sense of humor. We forgive and forget. However, it may be that Democrat Leftists have offended one or two of us who, riled by their betrayal and mendacity, their snake oil shtick now stroke their lovely loaded guns and whet their Bowie knives, sprout hair, fanged teeth and howl at the bloody moon, and…and… no wait! I’m ok… I think. Don’t be afraid. Your house is safe; your maidenhead remains unspoiled.
So hey, we’ll see you at the November polls: The true and merciless Machinery of Banishment. We will be there.