"When they allow a talk show host to play them like a two-dollar banjo, they demonstrate what kind of backbone they'll bring to the job later on, if we elect them. After they get elected will they continue to allow Jeff Crank to put a nickel in them and wind them up every Saturday morning?"
Barry Noreen
Columnist, Colorado Springs Gazette







Wednesday, December 30, 2009

FICCIONES


By

ROBERT HARKINS JD.

FICCIONES, Jorge Luis Borges. A collection of stories (1941-45) containing surreal, and fantastic themes, landscapes and characters that defy reality. [Ficciones. Fiction]

The young man is enrolled at MIT, America’s most prestigious science oriented university. His father and mother are well invested in Oil and extremely wealthy. Like all good parents they love their son. Love and money therefore will be the engine of his life and happiness. His parents are a nice couple filled with high hopes for a child born late in the years of their marriage. It is indeed a cause for joy for them to think that one day their only son will marry a good woman of excellent family. Privately, sometimes giggling, lightheartedly, his parents suggest to one another a variety of names for their many grandchildren to be—some sincere and others entirely silly. Momma, as her husband now calls her affectionately, touches gently her husband’s cheek. “Father, how wonderful to dream of grand children,” Father smiles and takes her gently in his arms.


Because Momma and Father are good and devout and because their child is sacred, (as all children are sacred), they provide him the very best of everything: an education at the finest and most challenging private schools, and the best tutors when necessary to help him master difficult subjects. Because they want to instill in their son wisdom as well as intelligence, they insist that he become fluent in several of the world’s great languages; for they believe that to speak and comprehend the language of other nations, is to know, respect and empathize with their people. Furthermore, because they believe that wisdom is unattainable to men ignorant of philosophy and religion, they also insist that their son study the great philosophical works, not only of Western Civilization, but also of India, China and the Middle East. As their son applies himself to his studies, they are delighted to hear him speak with budding understanding, from the works of Aristotle and Plato, from the Holy Bible, Bhagavad Gita, the Upanishads, Koran, and Confucian Classics.


While Momma and Father are moved by an endearing bias to think of their son as probably the most exceptional of all children, in fact, there is good reason to believe that their bias is not altogether misplaced. For their son is attentive to his parents and studies diligently. Indeed, for all his youth, he is disciplined and devout. Furthermore, it does not appear, at first, that their lavishing of millions upon him has inflated his ego, or tainted his heart with arrogance. He remains plain, quiet and generous. He does not condescend to those who, of course, are not nearly as fortunate, talented, and intelligent as their dark haired boy. Momma and Father, themselves deeply religious, experience with profound gratitude his deepening maturity.


As their son comes of age, Momma and Father buy him a palatial home, and every year the sports car of his choice, this year a Ferrari, a silly car Momma thinks. Indeed, she muses, “Where, for example, would my son fit all my grand children and his wife into such a tiny car? Ridiculously expensive too,” she concludes in passing, “but it is my son’s wish and as I have the power to grant it, he shall have it.”


As the years pass however, their son begins to indulge himself in virtually endless vacations in the Swiss Alps, French Riviera, Paris, Madrid, and exotic places with strange names too difficult to recall; indeed, they have lost track of all his adventures. They can hardly remember the number of his grand homes scattered across Europe, or of the long, white yachts he sails about the oceans of the earth. Privately, without quite expressing their outright shock, they discuss their concern that their son consorts with women Momma describes as “loose, profane, and irreligious;” women, of cheap character and ambition, women of multiple nationalities, other than their unadulterated race, women not mothers, who come and go, doubtless enriched by their brief liaison with her son. In this suspicion, Momma is not entirely wrong.


Nevertheless, to quiet their anxiety, Momma and Father take each the other gently to task. “After all boys will be boys,” Father quips perhaps recalling his distant youth.“Well, yes, I understand,” replies Momma. “This after all is the 21st century. We cannot hope to keep him locked in a box.” They laugh uneasily. Momma sighs, “Still, when will he marry? When will I hold in my arms my new grand sons?” Her husband gives her a hug. Later, hands joined, they kneel and pray that all will be well.


Have you heard this story before? Then you know the ending. The son quits college, becomes addicted to drugs. At the end, he is found on a dark, dead-end street somewhere in a dirty corner of a run-down European city, sloped over the wheel of his new Lamborghini, dead of an overdose; Dead, and worn out, far older than his years.


But our story does not end that way. The son sets aside his childish ways. He becomes even more devout. He takes up religion with a religious teacher deeply respected in their country. To his parents’ delight he graduates from MIT. He promises his good parents grandchildren, “Soon, Momma. Soon Father. Very soon. A wife and sons.”


In a dingy room, rank with the smell of lethal chemicals, somewhere in Nigeria, the son, having cleansed himself with prayer, and now calmed by communion with his God, puts the finishing touches on an explosive package, which, Allah willing, on Christmas day will strike from the sky, Northwest Flight 253. Death and repentance will be his message to all who live in the U.S., abode of the Great Satan’, for the living must repent their obscene ways and in the end accept Islam and Allah, the Koran and the Caliphate. Finally, his work nearly done, he selects a syringe from a box containing a number of identical syringes.


Of all the syringes contained in the box, this syringe only is defective.


The son smiles inwardly, and recalls his months of practice with Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab his best friend, a man blessed as he is blessed with wealth, privilege, education and utter devotion to the cause. In passing, he thinks of the Americans. How foolish they are. Abdul will succeed even in the face of his father’s report to the United States Embassy in Lagos, that long ago his son joined a terrorist camp, that al Qaida taught him the instruments of terror and death. It is enough to make him laugh—even as he places gently the chemicals into packages Umar will attach to his leg and fit snugly into his underwear.



How simple is the bomb. Foolproof really. All that Umar need do is inject the contents of the syringe into the powerful explosive. Even so the son has placed far more than enough explosive into the small bag to thrice obliterate Northwest Flight 253. He smiles at the thought; the debris will fall like a bloody rain upon the carnal city of Detroit. He prays that the Americans on Northwest Flight 253 will, for just an instant, see their wretched sins, the darkness of their souls and the cleansing light of Allah.


The son tries to capture in his mind’s eye, the glorious instant of their death. But he is tired. He has worked long and hard in the service of his God. He is unable to conjure the vision. Perhaps later. Alas, there is nothing now to do but wait and anticipate. He must be patient. Afterwards, of course, he will pray.


Napolitano, learning of the survival of Northwest Flight 253, announced to the world that the passengers’ survival proved that President O’bama’s anti-terrorist strategies worked. Later, of course, she would allege her statement had been taken out of context.


On September 19, 2001 in a piece written for Hyde Park Herald. Barrack Obama attributed 9/11 related terrorism to, "a climate of poverty and ignorance, helplessness and despair." Even more so, Obama went on to say:"They see poverty all around them and they are angry by that poverty. They may be suffering under oppressive and corrupt regimes and that kind of environment is a breeding ground for fanaticism and hatred.” "It's absolutely critical that the U.S. is engaged in policies and strategies that will give those young people and these countries hope and make it in their self-interest to participate and create modern, open societies like we have in the U.S."[1]


My column Ficciones is fiction based on fact. Ms. Napolitano’s statement, as I have paraphrased it, and the President’s bizarre sociological theories are the stuff of Borges’ Ficciones.[2]



What do you think?



[1] Eric Erickson. Human Events. Red State Briefing. Barrack Obama’s Post-Modern Liberal Syllogisms Keep Falling Apart. 12/28/2009

Monday, December 28, 2009


"The Year in Review- excerpts from 2009"
by John Alexander Madison
December 28, 2009

The mission of the Fourth Estate (the media), from the outset, has been to control the agenda…and our government…and our minds. With the November 2008 elections it is clearer than ever that the Fourth Estate has fulfilled their ambitious 200 year plan. If you agree this is our reality in 2009, the question is “What are YOU going to do about it?” (May 4)

History (along with a bit of common sense) tells us that tax cuts stimulate the economy, due to the very basic reality that when people can keep more of their own money they will have more money to spend. Tax increases, fee increases and a departure from a free market economy to more government control over our lives is a formula for disaster. (May 11)

Every day we have the opportunity to hug our loved ones; to thank the brave men and women of our armed forces for securing our freedoms; to thank the public servants who provide for our personal safety at our local police and fire departments; to take our dog on a walk; to be grateful for our health; and to give thanks for all the blessings in our lives. So do not despair. (May 18)

Now is the time for us all to help ensure that elections remain transparent, honest and accurate. If we don’t, the plethora of legislation now being introduced and enacted to liberalize our election processes will continue, to our future regret. That’s when the really big chill will set in. (May 25)

By pointing out that we are a nation of immigrants it is clear that we are different in many ways. But what should bind us together, what “really matters” is that we are Americans first. As American citizens, we are granted and guaranteed certain freedoms, among them being life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion. There are a lot of good people out there. Let’s concentrate on them. (June 1)

The fabric of our great nation is being destroyed in a matter of months as surely as the original American Flag by Betsy Ross has deteriorated over the last 233 years. (June 8)

And, believe it or not, the opportunity to return Colorado to an era of personal responsibility, traditional marriage, respect for life, lower taxes and fees, support of a free market economy, and less government interference in our daily lives is only 17 months away, or more precisely 505 days away. But who’s counting? (June 15)

It seems that assimilation is no longer a shared goal of all immigrants. Therein may be the singular reason why many believe our democracy is in danger. (June 22)

… in What’s So Great about America, best-selling author Dinesh D'Souza takes on all of America’s critics and proves them wrong—as perhaps only a writer with an immigrant’s understanding of this country can. He defends not an idealized America, but America as it really is, and measures America not against utopia, but against the rest of the world in a provocative, challenging book.” (June 29)

As Sarah Palin said only yesterday “only dead fish go with the flow.’ So, let’s get out there and do something to restore America to a more realistic vision. Amen. (July 6)

Surely, we can agree with our President in at least one area. “It is time for a change…change we can believe in.” It is time to take back America, beginning in Washington, D.C., then Denver, Colorado. Or, is it already too late? (July 13)

Regarding celebrities and rock stars we glorify and, in some cases, deify them. At the same time we choose to ignore their lifestyles or song lyrics which directly impact the behaviors and future choices of our children. It is high time to redefine qualifications for the celebrity status we confer on so many who, quite simply, do not deserve the honor. (July 20)

My personal response to the very talented Mr. Lennon whose life was cut way too short and the perhaps well-meaning but certainly inexperienced Mr. Obama regarding your shared agenda for socialism in America… no, I cannot IMAGINE that! (July 27)

The fact is we may not agree on all of these issues but it is our civic duty to develop opinions, share our views and reach consensus where possible. (August 3)

Goodbye National Endowment for the Arts! The federal government needs to get out of this business. (August 10)

How about, from this day forward, electing only those…who pledge no new taxes or fees for at least their next term in office; those who pledge to support growing infrastructure and national security needs only through thorough elimination of waste, fraud and abuse in government spending and programs, and not new taxes? (August 17)

A tribute to the Rocky Mountain Repertory Theater, its Board and actors…May your future be as bright as the lights on opening night (2011) in the new Rocky Mountain Repertory Theater! (August 24)

…the liberals controlling Congress (Ds and a few Rs) will not consider, in any way shape or form, the inclusion of tort reform in this so-called “comprehensive” national health care program. America has the best health care system in the world but we can all agree it is, at times, somewhat expensive. So how better to lower health care costs than to insist on tort reform. (August 31)

Hope that the downward spiral of our government can be reversed and that the hopes and dreams of every American can be achieved, once again, through opportunity and hard work…not through government handouts. (September 7)

Dick Enberg, normally smooth television tennis commentator, opined after the Williams (U.S. Open) match that the line umpire’s foot fault call was clearly a case of “over officiating.” Really? (September 14)

…with all the talk about a national healthcare program, one which won’t cost us a dime (if you believe that), it seems Americans should do all we can, immediately, to control or lower our health care costs. You’ve just read about 20 ways to do just that. (September 21)

America needs a literate and engaged citizenry, not a dumbed-down, indoctrinated, programmed citizenry and certainly not a citizenry to serve the government. What we need is a united citizenry which will notify the government when it has lost its way. (September 28)

Bonus Question: As ineffective and inexperienced as President Obama has proven to be in only his first nine months in office should he resign, allowing Joe Biden to become President AND, thereafter, should Congress name Nancy Pelosi as our Vice President…placing her one heartbeat from the Presidency? (No, she is close enough already at #3) (October 5)

It might be somewhat embarrassing for the 2009 Novel Peace Prize winner to be acknowledged in the same article as Dr. Norman Borlaug. But I won’t hesitate to do it anyway…As one Ivy League scholar immediately observed the Nobel Peace Prize “has been diminished forever.” Of course, that may have already happened when Jimmy Carter (2002) and Al Gore (2007) were named previous winners. (October 12)

For the November 2010 General election we must nominate and support fiscally conservative/responsible candidates for Congress. We need to elect Americans who believe in preserving individual freedoms; the limited role of government; a strong national defense; traditional family values; the sanctity of human life; local control of our schools; and a free-market economy. (October 19)

You are kidding right? In answering the question “Who Do You Trust?” the choice is Congress or GOD? Well, having 'In God We Trust' on our money AND KEEPING IT THERE sounds like a darn good idea to me. How about you? (October 26)

Let’s not forget that the Republican Party is the party of Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan. The Republican Party is the party of once and future greatness…that is IF the Republican Party and its elected leadership return to its core values. (November 2)

The national healthcare legislation being pushed by President Obama is an act of desperation. He is trying to save his presidency, but ironically, it will be the straw that broke the camel’s back…the reason which causes his presidency to fail. That is unless we “kill the bill.” Those words are resonating daily at modern day tea parties throughout the country. Perhaps Mr. Obama has awoken a sleeping giant, the dreaded silent majority. We shall see. (November 9)

Revenues are down for everyone and your local and state governments are no exception. But while you and I cut expenses our government seems more inclined to impose new taxes and fees than cutting expenses. That must change. (November 16)

…it is important to also be thankful for our nation’s leadership, including President Barrack Hussein Obama (D), Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), U.S. Senate Majority leader Harry Reid (D, NV), Senators Charles Schumer (D, NY) and Christopher Dodd (D, CT) and former Congressman and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel. Why? Because these folks and their disciples have, in ten short months, reminded us that socialism has never worked and never will. (November 23)

Let’s face it, beyond remarkable outcomes by our military establishment with ever decreasing resources, our federal government has proven to be incapable of anything more than building an unsustainable bureaucracy and a national deficit beyond our ability to re-pay it…I believe, as did our Founding Fathers, that the role of our federal government is a limited one. (November 30)

In summary, never forget the sacrifices of all Americans who have served in our armed forces and who deserve our support every single day of the year; animal abusers are sick people; and those who abuse the most innocent among us, our children, are sub-human…the scum of the Earth. There, I said it…and I hope you agree. (December 7)

When it’s all said and done….Tiger Woods will be known as the first professional athlete in the world to earn over one billion dollars; he will be known as one of the best golfers ever; and he will be known as a man of bad character, a serial cad. (December 14)

Political correctness is a creation of the liberal left. Attempts by extremist liberals to do away with all references to Christianity offend, by last count, over one billion people worldwide. They can only succeed if we let them. (December 21)

EPILOGUE
May the New Year bring much health, happiness and prosperity to us all…our families, our friends, our elected leaders, our spiritual leaders, and also those with whom we may disagree…and lets work together to make this great nation an even better place to live.

Happy New Year 2010!

Saturday, December 26, 2009

Jeff and his Elephant Scrubbie

Jake the Producer in his favorite Christmas gift....
the Leopard Print Snuggie....




Wednesday, December 23, 2009

THE TRUTH WILL OUT


By

ROBERT HARKINS J.D.

The Health Care bill has passed. What have they done? The Democrats have engaged in a constitutional and bipartisan breach of faith. They have demeaned their oath of office with bribery and corruption, with gross and subtle deceits. They have defied the American will. Is there no shame? No, none at all. Senator Harkin said of bribery; it is “Small Stuff;” it is the big picture, he tells us, that counts.[1] Senator Harry Reid said that special treatment (to those who cooperate) is what legislation is all about.

The Democrat House and Senate have passed a bill virtually no one has read. Democrats voting Yea, who approve or are ignorant of its despotic language and intent, know full well they are voting against an American majority, and know full well the damage they will do to the economy, to American freedoms, to this Republic and her Constitution. The President and Democrats in the House and Senate do not believe a word of the deficit-neutral propaganda they have pitched for a year. In fact, they know that the Bill will run enormous deficits as it careens toward bankruptcy. Democrats have said not a word to explain how this Bill will lower health care costs and avoid deficits when the Democrats previous health care interventions, Medicare and Medicaid, are running obscene deficits as they teeter on the edge of bankruptcy.

The Bill is not and will never be deficit neutral. It will not lower the cost of health care. Because Democrats will plunder 400 billion dollars from Medicare, rationing for the elderly is inevitable. The President knows this will be the outcome. Even so, he will sign the Bill. Why not? This is, after all, not about Health Care; it is about the President—a President who has already broken every promise solemnly made to induce Americans to entrust him with the Presidency.

Statutes enacted in medieval English Parliaments contained unlawful and laughable language that sought to enjoin future generations of Parliament from amending or repealing these statutes. The Democrats intend to revive this medieval outlawry.

“Senator Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) pointed out some rather astounding language in the Senate health care bill during floor remarks tonight…. he pointed out that the Reid bill declares on page 1020 that the Independent Medicare Advisory Board cannot be repealed by future Congresses.[2]

What have they done? The Democrats alone have magnified the insensate power of a nearly bankrupt, Welfare State. They have imposed taxes on middle class Americans they cannot, should not and will not tolerate. They have engaged in sophist language to disguise the Bill’s unconscionable impact on American privacy and wealth, property and freedoms.

Americans who despise duplicity hate this bill. They realize they are the targets of its consumptive reach. No one really knows the full measure of the damage it will cause; for how many have read or understand the two thousand pages of its tortuous language, language intended not to inform but to obfuscate? And who will write or read its ten thousand pages of invasive regulations?

Democrats have provoked American anger; they have answered their anger with contempt. There is no need to repeat the defamatory language they have hurled at conservative Americans. We know it too well. Still, Democrats face a grave political crisis. The crisis is that steadily over time the “…truth will come to light; murder cannot be hid long;… but at length the truth will out.”[3]

It is true that Americans are wrathful. But they will express their wrath quietly and with telling force, as is their right, when next they meet at the polls.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all! A special Merry Christmas to Jeff Crank for his unflagging efforts to restore democracy and Constitutional government to this great America. Merry Christmas to my colleagues who write their weekly columns. And as Tiny Tim would say,

God bless us everyone.



[1] Political Hot Sheet. 12/22/09

[2] Weekly Standard Blog. 12/22/09

[3] Shakespeare, 1600. Merchant of Venice, Lancelot.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Christmas Musings

By The Lone Front Ranger

December 22, 2009



Before I get to my Christmas musings, I need to get a few things off my chest from this week.

McInnis’s LG Pick

There has been speculation in the blogs this week about whom Scott McInnis might be picking for his Lieutenant Governor. Such discussion, regardless of candidate, always turns to how to shore up the perceived weakness of the Gubernatorial candidate. If we were talking about how to balance areas of expertise, you won’t get any argument from me. That is completely appropriate. What is interesting to me about the current discussions (and in discussions during past elections) is the insistence on needing to gender-balance the ticket. NOTE: this is not an anti-female statement. We have many fine conservative female candidates, especially here in El Paso County. And if one of those women is THE best candidate, I will support that decision. But let’s make sure the person selected is THE best candidate, and not chosen simply for gender. I am not in favor of Affirmative Action, and selecting a woman simply because of her gender is insulting to women.

Dane Nowels

I attended the Memorial Service for Dane Nowels this week. Dane was a patriot, defender of freedom, and unapologetic 2nd Amendment advocate. RIP.

Paying Respect

Do you know someone serving in the military? How about someone spending Christmas away from their families while serving overseas? If you have not taken the time to thank them for their service, send a package or send a card,. Try out: www.operationtroopsupport.org , an organization that sends packages to our service personnel, whether or not you personally know someone in the military. On that note, are there Veterans in your area who are alone on Christmas? Invite them for Christmas dinner. Look at what they have done for your freedom. It’s the least you can do.

Shameful Behavior in D.C.

Voting at 1:00 a.m. Need I say more? When you know that you are doing something wrong, you are likely to try and hide it. And as my Grandmother always said, “Nothing good ever happens after midnight”.

Christmas

Finally, on to Christmas. I celebrate Christmas. If you do too, I wish you a Merry Christmas. If you are Jewish, I wish you a Happy Hanukah. If you celebrate something else, let me know and I will wish you a happy, merry or joyous one of those. I am not likely, however, to wish you happy holidays. Thank goodness Congress has not yet mandated that!

Monday, December 21, 2009


“Merry Christmas”

by John Alexander Madison
December 21, 2009

In order to be 100% politically correct this winter holiday season I send my best wishes to you and your families for a very Merry Christmas and a happy and healthy new year. There I said it: MERRY CHRISTMAS, MERRY CHRISTMAS, MERRY CHRISTMAS! Shout it from the roofs tops as we celebrate the birth of Jesus across this great Christian nation and most countries around the world.

A Christian nation? It seems all too many people are asking nowadays “Is America a Christian nation?” Let there be no doubt about it…America is a Christian nation and anyone with just the slightest bit of intellectual honesty will agree.

That is not to say secular progressives, radical left-wing liberals, atheists (those who reject the idea that deities exist), and others are trying to change that. But it is indisputable; our great nation was founded on Christian principles which are quite clear after only the briefest exposure to the Bible, our Constitution, and our Founding Fathers.

Is America a Christian Nation? Many people, today, don't think so. The truth is, however, that our great nation was founded on principles that are found all throughout the Bible. Author and historian David Barton highlights our Christian heritage in an ‘eye opening message’ at In Touch Ministries Online. Check out his presentation at www.intouch.org. It is well worth a listen.

When speaking of our Founding Fathers many refer to the signers of the three primary, foundational documents of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence (1776), the Articles of Confederation (ratified in 1781), and the Constitution of the United States (1789). There were 118 different signers of these documents, some of whom signed more than one of these documents.

Others who may be considered “founding fathers” are those who attended the Constitutional Convention of 1787, those who served as Senators in the First Federal Congress (1789-1791), and those who served as Representatives in the First Federal Congress.

One source (www.adherents.com) lists 175 Founding Fathers with their religious affiliations as follows: 88 Episcopalian/Anglican; 30 Presbyterian; 27 Congregationalists; and 30 others as Quakers, Dutch or German Reformed, Lutheran, Catholic, Huguenot, Unitarian, Methodist, and Calvinist. That looks like a lot of Christians to me.

Christianity is a set of beliefs, a way of life, and a community of people. Those who wish to celebrate Christmas will do so. However, Christians and non-Christians alike not going to work on December 25 are off due to it being Christmas. Schools are closed on December 25 because it is Christmas. That’s the way it is and that’s the way it will always be, the birth of Jesus is celebrated on December 25. No government can take that away from Christians.

Of course, many school districts across America refuse to acknowledge our nation’s Christian heritage or the fact that they have a Christmas holiday before and after December 25. They prefer to call it a winter holiday. But they are not fooling anyone, are they? They cannot take the celebration of Christmas away from Christians. Their actions are nothing more than political correctness gone awry.

Political correctness is a creation of the liberal left. Attempts by extremist liberals to do away with all references to Christianity offend, by last count, over one billion people worldwide. They can only succeed if we let them.

EPILOGUE
We’ve all seen the inscription on many crosses “INRI.” That is an acronym of the Latin inscription:

IESVS•NAZARENVS•REX•IVDÆORVM (Jesus Nazarenus, Rex Judaeorum), which translates in English as "Jesus the Nazarene (or Jesus of Nazareth), King of the Jews."

Merry Christmas TO ALL…and to all a good night!

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

The Fascist Octopus has sung its Swan Song, the Jackboot is thrown into the Melting Pot.[1]

By

ROBERT HARKINS J.D.

If you have read this far, you know that the “English language is in a bad way. While the O’Bama Administration, true to Chicago politics, is shredding truth and pitching falsehoods, its invention of euphemisms has transformed language into Rapp-beat Art. Americans are already wary of the government euphemisms Revenue Enhancement, Resources, and Investment. They prefer instead the honest word “Tax.” When government engages in Revenue Enhancement, or when it is marauding for Resources, that is, as it seeks new ways to pillage your paycheck money for government Investment, it uses the state’s police power to take it from you. When Presidents Bill Clinton and Baraq O’Bama decided to impose new taxes, they explained that they would ask Americans to pay their fair share. Ask! How could they describe the imposition of the state’s police power as a mere request. If the Presidents had merely requested additional taxes many of us might have politely declined.

Chief Supreme Court Justice John Marshall, shortly after the drafting of the American Constitution, wrote that, “The power to tax, involves the power to destroy.” Two centuries later, Americans must bear witness to the destruction wrought by the unrestrained imposition of the Police Power to run up obscene deficits— taxes imposed over and above taxes taken directly from American wealth— to borrow, print, spend, steal and squander so much of America’s wealth that indebted generations unborn will not possess the wealth to pay it down.

Virtually all Americans are privy to the government’s bastardization of words. A degree in English is not necessary to understand that the invention of the euphemisms, Overseas Contingency Operation and Man made Disaster is intended to obscure the fact of Islamic Jihadist Terrorism, the terrorist suicide bombing and slaughter of innocent, defenseless men, women and children. It is past time to repudiate the government’s destruction of clarity in words. The late journalist and author, George Orwell explains that if we embrace the discipline of oral and written clarity we will avoid the mental vices of government language. We will,

…think more clearly, and to think clearly is a necessary first step toward political regeneration: so that the fight against bad English is not frivolous and is not the exclusive concern of professional writers.

Orwell did not live to hear shouted at Americans vacuous slogans such as Yes we can but he warned against the easy acceptance of political language.

Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different. Statements like… The Soviet press is the freest in the world,… are almost always made with intent to deceive. Other words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly, are: class, totalitarian, science, progressive, reactionary, bourgeois, equality.

Is there an American graduate from high school or college who has not read a paragraph similar to that Orwell composes here to explain how modern writing can shrive even from a poem in Ecclesiastes, its clear and elegant meaning? “Now that I have made this catalogue of swindles and perversions, let me give another example of the kind of writing that they lead to….

I returned and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.


Here it is in modern English:

Objective considerations of contemporary phenomena compel the conclusion that success or failure in competitive activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity, but that a considerable element of the unpredictable must invariably be taken into account.

Governments use metaphors to obscure meaning and intention. The President told Americans that everybody has to have some skin in the game. Interesting, but just what did the President mean? Orwell, warns that when a politician uses metaphors, “…it can be taken as certain that [he] is not seeing a mental image of the objects he is naming; in other words he is not really thinking.” [Where, for example, is there meaning in the title of this column]?

Indeed, when listening to politicians, Orwell admitted, as we Americans might also admit, to “…a curious feeling that one is not watching a live human being but some kind of dummy…. A speaker who uses that kind of phraseology has gone some distance toward turning himself into a machine. The appropriate noises are coming out of his larynx, but his brain is not involved, as it would be if he were choosing his words for himself. If the speech he is making is one that he is accustomed to make over and over again, he may be almost unconscious of what he is saying…. And this reduced state of consciousness, if not indispensable, is at any rate favourable to political conformity….”

What then are Americans to do? Well, writes Orwell, remember that, “In our age there is no such thing as ‘keeping out of politics’. All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred, and schizophrenia.” Therefore, “If you simplify your English, you are freed from the worst follies of orthodoxy.” And remember that, “Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind….” One cannot change this all in a moment, but one can at least change one's own habits, and from time to time one can even, if one jeers loudly enough, send some worn-out and useless phrase [like Overseas Contingency Operations]— or other lump of verbal refuse — into the dustbin where it belongs.”

What is to be done? Americans must insist on facts. They must not be mute and passive to the Administration’s passing of pure wind, however solid in appearance. Americans must jeer loudly at euphemisms that demean truth and plain, clear words. When necessary, Americans should call a speech for what it is: verbal refuse. And finally, when the Administration, its senators, congressman, and talking heads hand you wordy trash, hand it back with this:

The Fascist Octopus has sung its Swan Song,

The Jackboot is thrown into the Melting Pot.

What do you think?



1. Title and references are taken from George Orwell’s essay, Politics and the English Language. Available on the Internet.

Monday, December 14, 2009


“You Can Tell a Person’s Character (or lack thereof) by the Company They Keep”

by John Alexander Madison
December 14, 2009

There is no denying it. When the discussion rolls around to the greatest golfers of all time, the top ten ranking may go something like this: Jack Nicklaus, Ben Hogan, Bobby Jones, Sam Snead, Byron Nelson, Arnold Palmer, Gary Player, Walter Hagan and Gene Sarazan. If you know anything about golf you'll find it hard to argue these players belong in the top ten. And, if you are good at math, you will notice only nine golfers are listed. Who is missing? Coming in number one or two on just about anybody’s list would be a fellow by the name of Eldrick Tont. He was born on December 30, 1975 in Cypress, California. Through his parents ancestry he is one-quarter Chinese, one-quarter Thai, one-quarter African American, one-eight Native American, and one-eight Dutch…and a Buddist.

At age 33, Eldrick Tont’s records include 71 PGA tour wins, including 14 majors, and 57 other championship wins. Without a doubt he will forever be included on any list of the world’s greatest golfers…he is and always will be a great golf champion.

There are other lists
Another list includes President John Fitzgerald Kennedy (D, MA), President William Jefferson Clinton (D, AR), Governor Elliot Spitzer (D, NY), Senator John Edwards (D, NC), Governor Marshall Clement “Mark” Sanford (R, SC), Governor Jim McGreevey (D, NJ), Pastor Ted Haggard (New Life Church, CO), Kobe Bryant (NBA), Michael Jordan (NBA), David Beckham (MLS), Donald Trump, Brad Pitt (Actor), Prince Charles (Prince of Wales), Amy Winehouse (singer), David Letterman (television host), Gordon Ramsay (television chef)…and, not to be forgotten, Eldrick Tont. They all cheated on their spouses and they are all guilty of infidelity. By any honest assessment they are all cads.

Dictionary.com defines a “cad” as “an ill-bred man, especially one who behaves in a dishonorable or irresponsible way toward women.” Ms. Winehouse, more properly I suppose, is a wannabee cad or a “cad-ette” having admitted to an extra-marital affair in her divorce proceedings.

An historical perspective
In the context of a list of all-time greatest golfers, Eldrick Tont is in great company. In the context of a list of all-time cads, Eldrick Tont is in great company.

Regarding the expression “You Can Tell a Person’s Character by the Company They Keep” I’ve modified it a bit, adding “You Can Tell a Person’s Character (or lack thereof) by the Company They Keep.”

Character is defined as “the aggregate of features and traits that form the individual nature of some person…moral or ethical quality.” By all accounts, Eldrick Tont lacks good character. Who would have known?

EPILOGUE
Eldrick Tont, of course, was born Eldrick Tont Woods, a/k/a Tiger Woods.

Left in the awake of Eldrick’s selfish behavior is the permanent damage which has been inflicted upon his loving wife Elin Nordegrin, her daughter Sam Alexis, her son Charlie Axel, and Swedish golfer, Jesper Parnevik who introduced Elin to Tiger. Reacting to Tiger’s recently disclosed infidelity Parnevik said "I hope she uses a driver next time instead of a 3-iron." I suspect many will agree.

When it’s all said and done….Tiger Woods will be known as the first professional athlete in the world to earn over one billion dollars; he will be known as one of the best golfers ever; and he will be known as a man of bad character, a serial cad.

The Seventh Commandment reads: Thou shalt not commit adultery. (Exodus 20:14)

Thursday, December 10, 2009

The Coming Inter-generational War




By Range Rider


A loud shot was heard on Capitol Hill today. Many will assume the noise was about looming inflation. Some may think it is part of a carefully planned and well-executed step to skillfully stimulate the economy, and then artfully control inflation. The reality: it’s a warning shot of the coming inter-generational war.

Today, the Democrats announced they intend to increase the debt ceiling by up to $1.8 trillion, to a staggering sum of $13.9 trillion. At the same time, the Senate and President Obama are beginning to talk of clearing the legislative agenda after passing health care reform and cap and trade so, believe it or not, they can focus on deficit reduction.

Inter-generational war is coming. Root cause: spending our children and grandchildren’s money today to benefit ourselves and systematically destroying the capitalist model that would give them a decent change to recover from this Administration’s ill-conceived experiment.

It’s clear it is a war that the American people don’t expect and wouldn’t want. The President’s plunging popularity is ample evidence. Yet the Chicago-style machine continues to grind down resistance through threats and intimidation. If Congress doesn’t want to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, the government threatens to use “command and control” to do so. … but the Rider digresses from the topic.

The current broad expansion of entitlement programs is being paid for by deficit spending, enabled primarily by China’s willingness to buy our debt. Our offspring will pay heavily with an inevitable and increasing tax burden, while US economic power slides into socialist mediocrity. And that’s the best scenario. Should China decide they no longer care to support our lifestyle and stop funding it, greater economic chaos will ensue.

Most American citizens and companies have taken the prudent course…reduced spending, making do with less, and working harder. Not the government: most departments will receive an 8 to 10 percent increase next year, with few programs that truly target a return to prosperity. Successful stimulus programs feature tax cuts for citizens and companies, and less money for the government. Never happen under the Obama Administration.

Young Americans will need to save even more and hope that they stay healthy. They will be forced to buy health insurance to subsidize the sick and older generations, fund Medicare that has expanded coverage to everyone 55 or over, pay more for electricity, have fewer choices of cars to drive, and wait until their health problems become chronic to receive care.

Make no mistake, they will fight back. They should and will win, and this aging Rider will be among their thundering herd.

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

? THE AMERICAN LEGACY ?


BY ROBERT HARKINS J.D.

Since the tinsel efflorescence of last year’s election, Republicans, those who remain in office, seldom speak to the now quaint and threadbare idea of lower taxes, reduced deficits, smaller Government, conservative virtue and faith in the plain words of an American Constitution. In a destructive departure from conservative principle, it is now pragmatism, so called, that fires the engine of American politics. “Getting along” is more profitable than revolution.

Republicans need to change. And they need to change now. However, in the New York race between Dede Scozzafava, Doug Hoffman, and Bill Owens the Republican National Committee [RNC], rejected the conservative candidate Doug Hoffman, endorsed “moderate” Republican Dede Scozzafava and gave her about a million dollars in campaign funds. The “moderate” Scozzafava withdrew from the race, stiffed the conservative Doug Hoffman and endorsed the liberal Democrat Bill Owens. Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich criticized Tea Party conservatives, who in their support of Doug Hoffman simply expressed their conservative beliefs. The Speaker has since admitted that his endorsement of Dede Scozzafava was a mistake. A mistake indeed, a million dollars of Republican money contributed to the campaign victory of a liberal Democrat.

The Speaker, in his pragmatic approach to his endorsement of a Republican candidate, characterized Ms. Scozzafava as a moderate. His characterization, however, works as great a violence to the truth as it does to the plain meaning of words. In fact, Ms. Scozzafava is a liberal who favors Union Card Check, citizen financing of abortion on demand, homosexual marriage and the failed, thoroughly corrupt Democrat “Stimulus” Bill. The Scozzafava debacle should remind conservatives that while getting along may well reserve a politician’s place at the pork trough, it will not restore the American Republic to its former freedoms and liberties. It will not free America from nation-destroying deficits. It will not deter the O’bama Administration from its dismantlement of a Constitutional Republic.

Again, in the last election, Republicans fielded a candidate, Senator John McCain, who began the celebration of his candidacy in a joint effort with the late and leftist Senator Kennedy to grant blanket amnesty to unidentified millions of illegal aliens—including murderous and sophisticated criminals, who in their search for the American Dream set up drug and ransom gangs in most major U.S. cities. Senator McCain takes pride in getting along, a practice that availed the former President Bush the Left’s breathtaking and undying malice, a virtue so called that caused the implosion of the Republican party even as it ushered in a Democrat President, Senate and House of Representatives. If this is pragmatism, it is also betrayal.

Whatever happened to the Republican Revolution? Well, since the “Catastrophe” Republicans have gathered by the river there to divine by sacrifice and incantation, by Delphic queries and exhortation, the mysterious cause of their angelic fall from light unto darkness. Nevertheless, we still hear talk about getting along, these Republicans who, during the eight years of the Bush Administration, revealed an avarice nearly as incandescent as the avarice of Democrats. It is not necessary to count the thousands of earmarks or conservative covenants betrayed, to realize that Republicans are no longer a voice for conservative change. What happened to the Revolution? It starved to death. Revolutions are not nourished by getting along. Revolutions are born from guts and nourished by conviction.

Republicans, during the Bush years, supported actively or by default an increasingly invasive Federal Government whose powers and confiscatory appetite have burgeoned even as its insatiate borrowing from China, Japan and other nations has exposed this country to the specter of shameful bankruptcy. All in all, conservatives have seen in the last eight years of Republican and Democrat rule, the evolution of greed, the metastasis of predatory Government, and upon the election of a Democrat Presidency, the massive public payoff of constituencies, the launching of a corrupt stimulus bill, the appointment of fanatic Czars, the mindless accumulation of debt and the slow-motion collapse of the American dollar.

Now with Democrats in power Americans will see emplaced in the Supreme Court, and Federal Courts, rogue judges who will legislate in ideological contempt of the Constitution’s primal mandate: to prevent by a balance and separation of powers the imposition of a despotic state. The President has appointed Czars who idealize cop killers and Karl Marx, who would teach children the lethal strategies of Mao Se Tung, who believe that Government should take unto itself the power to compel abortions and harvest human organs, and a fanatic O’bama appointee, gay activist Kevin Jennings, who as I write, is inviting adolescent children to accept, participate, and enjoy such sexually dangerous and deviate practices as “Fisting.”[1]

Conservatives in the Wilderness should ask Republicans a few questions. Republicans should answer or face the next election at their peril. What weight should we give your words? What have you done with eight years of the pragmatic exercise of power when if you had legislated from conservative principles you could have tied and bound this bulimic Government to the restraints of its Constitution? Have you held the bridge, even if laid low by the fist of indefatigable Leviathan? In defeat, do you still claim that you have been our champions, that in the years before the Wilderness you fought and lost the good fight— that you stand with us now head held high, bloody and unbowed? Give us a break. Tell us instead; do you have the guts and conviction to back our country from the abyss to which, in a nearly carnal embrace of Democrats, you have pushed her?

It is not that Republicans have lost their way; it is that they have lost sight of the genesis of moral power. It is not enough to seek political harmony by compromise. Political harmony will not preserve this America from the fate it is realizing even now at the hands of a degenerate Democrat Administration.

Here is an American champion. In the 1940s, Whittaker Chambers, repudiated his Communist past and testified to the fact that Communists had infiltrated the highest levels of American Government. He identified Communists Alger Hist who participated in the drafting of portions of the agreements reached at Yalta and Henry Dexter White, then Assistant Secretary of Treasury. Both Hist and White had handed over to a Communist apparatus, information marked secret and confidential. For years Chambers faced the caustic hatred and libel of a liberal press, particularly the New York Times and The Washington Post, who were determined to see as a means to the impeachment of Chamber’s testimony, the impeachment of his life, and the smearing of his reputation. It was the Post and the Times that urged in their editorials that Alger Hist sue Chambers for libel. Hist’s libel suit was dismissed with prejudice as Hist was convicted and imprisoned in a criminal prosecution for the commission of felony perjury. Hist, supported press rumors by implying before television cameras the falsehood that Chambers had several times been committed to a mental institution. False rumors were also spread that Chambers was a chronic drunk. There were other infamies. Chambers, however, would not back off. Where then did he find the moral courage to prevail? He wrote that its source lies “… [in] the power to hold convictions and to act upon them to the limit of life itself.”[2]

Conservatives have seen in a single year of the O’bama Administration the appointment of ideologues who have never met a parole, read an old book or worked honest calluses into their palms? Nevertheless, they have taken the gloves off with the American people. A groundswell of Americans for good reason detest the proposed health care plan and believe that global warming is as much a farce and scandal as the eighties warning, from the same strain of “activist scientists,” that the earth was on the brink of a new ice age.

The O’bama Administration intends to have its way with Americans. Of course, the iron fist wears a velvet glove. We hear in elegantly forged words, and poetic allusions to mystical visions, the promise of a free and liberating Utopia— as free and liberating, as it is false and malignant. Against this Republicans must take up again the gauntlet. If you would be our champions you must excise from Government the impact of the dead philosophies of nihilism, cultural relativism, tribalism— and a liberal fascism imposed on Americans by the Ax and whipping Rods of the Politically Correct. You must take in both hands, grasp and dismantle the fraudulent edifice and excess of the welfare state. To paraphrase Thomas Jefferson, you must bind again and forever, in the chains of an American Constitution, a now truly dangerous Government.

What finally, is the most important question? I believe it is this: What is the legacy we will bequeath the generations of our children, all children and therefore the world? In a half-century hence, when we are long done with legacies, what will our children say and think of us? Will America be to children just a word, nearly but not quite sacred, a word redolent of freedom’s image, much as a dried rose, in its scent and in the grace of its petals, is redolent of its once vibrant beauty? Or will they embrace in mind and heart again, our dream of America, a fragile dream yes, but a dream sweet with freedom and dignity. Will they say her name again in wonder and recall her history, courageous and hopeful? Will they say of us, in gratitude and happiness, that we held America sacred and in trust first and always for our children and all children? Will they believe as we believe that America is or should be an inspiration to everyone— and most of all to those who desperately need, ask and are graced by her sanctuary.

America’s fate, our fate, our children’s fate depends as it has always upon the power of a common credo, the depth and meter of a good, common and reverent heart, upon a still great and exceptional people. For this, and our children who are worth any sacrifice, we are forever grateful. But what will be our American legacy? It certainly will not be a legacy realized by getting along. The pragmatist’s legacy is already in its death throes. No, the American legacy resides in the human “… power to hold convictions and to act upon them to the limit of life itself.”

What say you Republicans?



[1] Safe schools' chief [Kevin Jennings, an O’bama Appointee] recommends child porn for classroom reading. 'Sex acts between preschoolers' [including Fisting] among subjects of books backed by openly 'gay' activist Kevin JenningsBy Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily, Dec.4, 2009.


[2]Whittaker Chambers, WITNESS (Rignery Publishing,1952)